tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post7989812039205035115..comments2024-02-13T05:50:58.322+08:00Comments on 區聞海小記: 事關公憤,何必孤憤?區聞海http://www.blogger.com/profile/00656035264879431353noreply@blogger.comBlogger39125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-83642782472035093712014-07-08T20:03:17.239+08:002014-07-08T20:03:17.239+08:00毛主席的徒子徒孫 , 胡主席習主席不會放過你的 , 你爆了他們的秘密毛主席的徒子徒孫 , 胡主席習主席不會放過你的 , 你爆了他們的秘密Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-42587364478913958802014-07-08T16:23:50.166+08:002014-07-08T16:23:50.166+08:00「毛主席教導....」- 唉!大陸都不跟毛主席的教導了!你想跟著毛主席,隨便吧!「毛主席教導....」- 唉!大陸都不跟毛主席的教導了!你想跟著毛主席,隨便吧!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-9669570558582869422014-07-08T14:33:24.159+08:002014-07-08T14:33:24.159+08:00匿名2014年7月5日 下午11:30
"Haven't the entire ... 匿名2014年7月5日 下午11:30<br /><br />"Haven't the entire HK population witnessed that verbal violence from the HK government and around the Basic Law is much much more evil than Mr. Wong's action of throwing a glass, particularly when the court hasn't even judged if Mr. Wong's action was intentional or not intentional? A planned ahead action or not a planned ahead action? Then at this stage of Mr. Wong's case, who have the right to make a verdict? Are you granted the right to be the court or represent the court?!”<br /><br />If the verdict has been passed by a court, Mr Wong would have been guilty of common assault and might have been sent to prison instead of playing filibusters in the LegCo.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-73954434617695031722014-07-08T06:56:53.047+08:002014-07-08T06:56:53.047+08:00毛主席教導 , 對只會搖尾巴的反動份子 , 不需客氣 , 站在廣大人民對立面的 , 用「死蠢」、「獻...毛主席教導 , 對只會搖尾巴的反動份子 , 不需客氣 , 站在廣大人民對立面的 , 用「死蠢」、「獻世」的形容詞 , 只不過反映他們的本質Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-89561751655009136342014-07-08T06:33:11.224+08:002014-07-08T06:33:11.224+08:00罵人「死蠢」、「獻世」等等的留言者,只顯示其修養及質素之低劣。
遊行、反對政府便「大哂」,不需要遵守...罵人「死蠢」、「獻世」等等的留言者,只顯示其修養及質素之低劣。<br />遊行、反對政府便「大哂」,不需要遵守法律嗎?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-60447264501438839202014-07-07T21:49:48.998+08:002014-07-07T21:49:48.998+08:00If the police insists that the "遊行帶頭車" w...If the police insists that the "遊行帶頭車" was blocking and slowing down the rally, one may argue that there were many police mini-vans (at least five) parked on one of the main path of the rally, "Pennington Street 邊寧頓街", during at the time of the rally. It shows that protestors were able to proceed without obstructed by the the police vans. Therefore there is no correlation between the "遊行帶頭車" and the rally was being slowed down. The purpose of the "遊行帶頭車" was to provide audio broadcast and transport audio equipments, which is equivalent to a 木板車 carrying the audio equipments. And the stopping of the "遊行帶頭車" by the "司機" was not controllable by the "司機" but by the need of the protestors to receive the audio broadcast.<br /><br />The "遊行帶頭車" on that part of the road was equivalent to the vans getting into "維園" football fields before each year's "維園年宵", to deliver materials and flowers. <br /><br />Therefore the 檢控 is discriminating and should be dropped.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-67467314203940964072014-07-07T20:42:06.040+08:002014-07-07T20:42:06.040+08:00Leave it to the court and let us see. <-------警... Leave it to the court and let us see. <-------警方是否應該檢控 , 與法庭如何判是兩回事 , 不應混淆 , 也有政府不但敗訴且被法官批評檢控馬虎不合理 , 97前的律政司把關較好 , 近年的律政司似乎專業水準下降 , 立場偏向加強Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-33216412168018529272014-07-07T20:05:41.593+08:002014-07-07T20:05:41.593+08:00警方濫用檢控權 , 這行為本身已經是一種政治攻擊 , 用政府的資源 , 透過法律程序 , 來虛耗被檢...警方濫用檢控權 , 這行為本身已經是一種政治攻擊 , 用政府的資源 , 透過法律程序 , 來虛耗被檢控者的時間金錢精力 , 這是極權政府常用的手法Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-37322331354776869372014-07-07T19:49:45.016+08:002014-07-07T19:49:45.016+08:00劉曉波也是 " 依法 " 檢控的啊 !劉曉波也是 " 依法 " 檢控的啊 !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-5863346350741771322014-07-07T19:46:49.810+08:002014-07-07T19:46:49.810+08:00「停車不熄匙」,用這罪檢控司機有什麼問題?
欲加之罪 , 何患無詞 , 這也不懂 , 死蠢 , 這...「停車不熄匙」,用這罪檢控司機有什麼問題?<br /><br />欲加之罪 , 何患無詞 , 這也不懂 , 死蠢 , 這些叫做 " 政治犯 " 啊 !<br /><br /><br />香港警察隊員佐級協會昨發聲明,指控7.1遊行「有人故意拖慢遊行速度」是「尋釁滋事」<br /><br />「尋釁滋事」第一次出現在香港警察的正式文件中 , 你知道「尋釁滋事」在大陸是對付什麼人的嗎 ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-25421420163964373062014-07-07T19:46:31.958+08:002014-07-07T19:46:31.958+08:00If the argument that the part of the road became &...If the argument that the part of the road became "private place" is valid, then the Government's legal advisor would not advise to prosecute and court would not punish the client. Leave it to the court and let us see.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-16777545322538119882014-07-07T19:22:01.574+08:002014-07-07T19:22:01.574+08:00>> 如果遊行帶頭車司機真的有犯「停車不熄匙」,用這罪檢控他有什麼問題?
The ro...>> 如果遊行帶頭車司機真的有犯「停車不熄匙」,用這罪檢控他有什麼問題?<br /><br />The road was authorized and designated to the protestors for that part of time, and no other cars would go through that part of the road. Thus at that moment, one may argue that that part of the road has become a "private place" for the protestors, as otherwise, one may argue that even the "街站" is illegal, and another one moving anything in that part of the road is unauthorized and/or violate certain laws, and/or charges the protestors being "jaywalk-ing".<br /><br />Therefore, the police and the HK government is quite brainless and shameless.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-79227307027105140832014-07-07T17:26:27.860+08:002014-07-07T17:26:27.860+08:00如果遊行帶頭車司機真的有犯「停車不熄匙」,用這罪檢控他有什麼問題?(示威人士吸太多的汽車廢氣對健康不...如果遊行帶頭車司機真的有犯「停車不熄匙」,用這罪檢控他有什麼問題?(示威人士吸太多的汽車廢氣對健康不好。)如果罪名成立,更証明他是故意超慢及無理停車去製造人多的假象。My Timenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-4400193359865482442014-07-07T17:10:57.726+08:002014-07-07T17:10:57.726+08:00黃毓民曾回應林鄭警告會有汽油彈, 這次
擲玻璃杯為何他不反駁:我已經無用汽油彈, 小事啦!
可能他事...黃毓民曾回應林鄭警告會有汽油彈, 這次<br />擲玻璃杯為何他不反駁:我已經無用汽油彈, 小事啦!<br />可能他事後心虛, 要用罵689應落地獄來justify 他擲玻璃杯相對下地獄, 擲玻璃杯是很輕的懲罰Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-77136010231907329932014-07-07T16:56:54.388+08:002014-07-07T16:56:54.388+08:00689用報警方式處理, 可能是聽到黃毓民在記者前喊他落地獄,加了這怒氣689用報警方式處理, 可能是聽到黃毓民在記者前喊他落地獄,加了這怒氣Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-1983314493786066922014-07-07T13:26:47.352+08:002014-07-07T13:26:47.352+08:00「警方執法」原來是用 「停車不熄匙」 罪檢控遊行帶頭車的司機 , 那些以為「 警方執法」 好正義的人...「警方執法」原來是用 「停車不熄匙」 罪檢控遊行帶頭車的司機 , 那些以為「 警方執法」 好正義的人 , 要用腦想一想了Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-55620851446064428312014-07-07T04:54:13.474+08:002014-07-07T04:54:13.474+08:00>> The political expression of the legal pro...>> The political expression of the legal professionals here was (I quote) "a silent march," which was powerful but non-violent. Such a march is a far cry from throwing a glass in an otherwise serious area of political exchange. I applaud the legal circle as much as the young peaceful demonstrators in Central but not (and never) Mr. Wong. <br /><br />My reply is this:<br /><br />Therefore you want everyone to act like you, think like you, do whatever like you, agree with whatever you suggest... (Isn't it?) I must tell you that if this is the case, you are trying to enforce and inject another kind of evil into this society.<br /><br />I didn't say that I agree or not agree with you that Mr. Wong's action was an illegal and/or violent one, nor was I saying that Mr. Wong's action was a legal and/or peaceful one. Our court will decide. <br /><br />What you said already excluded a possibility that Mr. Wong just had the glass slipped out of his hand and that Mr. Wong never had the intention to let the glass fly out towards somewhere. (Could this be a very possible possibility?)<br /><br />Therefore, you have already made up your mind on the matter, and therefore you have already put the law into your own hand, and pretending that you already have all the details and evidence to issue a verdict not in favor of Mr. Wong.<br /><br />If this is the case, you are being illogical yourself because you are trying to deprive my freedom of speech, and twisted my words to satisfy or match your opinion about my words. Then, you are doing great evil to our society with/without knowing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-55412228062610550682014-07-06T22:51:19.975+08:002014-07-06T22:51:19.975+08:00Mr. Wong's action of throwing a glass is stupi...Mr. Wong's action of throwing a glass is stupid and, if it violates the law, not excusable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-1137341733076426432014-07-06T22:36:25.861+08:002014-07-06T22:36:25.861+08:00No one here pretended to be the court to judge Mr....No one here pretended to be the court to judge Mr. Wong's action of throwing a glass as illegal. The judicial system will do the job. I am here to interpret Mr. Wong's action as a violent means of political expression. As the above commentator said, "the violation of the Basic Laws was already proven to have happened by the silent match [march] of legal professionals last month." The political expression of the legal professionals here was (I quote) "a silent march," which was powerful but non-violent. Such a march is a far cry from throwing a glass in an otherwise serious area of political exchange. I applaud the legal circle as much as the young peaceful demonstrators in Central but not (and never) Mr. Wong. <br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-33177601551524167922014-07-06T21:12:30.397+08:002014-07-06T21:12:30.397+08:00同689政府 , 公安的想法一樣 , 很恐怖的腦袋同689政府 , 公安的想法一樣 , 很恐怖的腦袋Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-42483317023018175672014-07-06T20:36:39.882+08:002014-07-06T20:36:39.882+08:00很恐怖的邏輯:和自己意見相同者的一切行為都沒有問題,暴力就變成抗爭;政府警方執法就是暴力。無言。很恐怖的邏輯:和自己意見相同者的一切行為都沒有問題,暴力就變成抗爭;政府警方執法就是暴力。無言。My Timenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-34688003552627167312014-07-06T19:42:00.815+08:002014-07-06T19:42:00.815+08:00連「暴力」和「抗爭」也故意混淆的人 , 都出來獻世 , 所以政府有689 , 立法會有吳亮星 , 一...連「暴力」和「抗爭」也故意混淆的人 , 都出來獻世 , 所以政府有689 , 立法會有吳亮星 , 一伙人配合得很好Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-22220783986771189772014-07-06T18:11:19.304+08:002014-07-06T18:11:19.304+08:00近日在海外旅遊,少看了區醫生的文章,今天看了上面的留言,「唉」了一聲,為什麼鼓吹暴力的留言會走到區醫...近日在海外旅遊,少看了區醫生的文章,今天看了上面的留言,「唉」了一聲,為什麼鼓吹暴力的留言會走到區醫生的「茶餐廳」來了?居然有人(不知是一人或多人,因為全都是匿名)讚揚擲玻璃杯的事件和議員?!相信遲些擲汽油彈也有人拍手掌。很恐怖的香港!My Timenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-69452397466621220702014-07-06T10:29:19.134+08:002014-07-06T10:29:19.134+08:00佔中被捉的511個學生 , 大家不會說他們阻街 , 教壞細路 , 黃毓民擲杯 , 大家不會說他不對 ...佔中被捉的511個學生 , 大家不會說他們阻街 , 教壞細路 , 黃毓民擲杯 , 大家不會說他不對 , 因為他們都在同一個更大的暴力對抗 , 689Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272230941716182786.post-21082911841418419532014-07-06T00:08:00.667+08:002014-07-06T00:08:00.667+08:00和平坐在遮打道 , 都拘捕了511件 , 好多仲係學生哥呀 , 689咁都可以落手 , 黃毓民擲得好...和平坐在遮打道 , 都拘捕了511件 , 好多仲係學生哥呀 , 689咁都可以落手 , 黃毓民擲得好 , 為小市民出啖氣Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com