Your math is obviously incorrect and you are trying to mislead. Your "某一點" actually means "1 person going through that 某一點 at any time during the 7-1 march", which could never happen (, unless in a communism or 軍管country). You have no evidence on "20%中途離開", and for this year, I suspect that the number of people who "中途離開" is much much higher than your "20%".
Your logic is faulty, because you indulge on the number of people who came out for the 7-1 march, but fail to include people who want to come out to protest but couldn't or wouldn't. The "622 proVote" already tells you that the potential population of 7-1 march could be as high as 790 thousands.
A responsible government would listen to a single person's opinion. But our current government obviously don't want to listen to any opposing opinions.
.JPG)
另尋一幅遊行照片與之相伴。這照片載於 www.img.secretchina.com。捕捉到行到灣仔時的現場感。額外展示了領頭的車和人群的關係。警方說，車行速度太慢令人群堵塞鼓躁，主辦單位不合作，須予檢控。（按：讀者留言提醒，該網頁用的照片應非今年遊行情景，若提示不錯，就沒有額外的參考作用了。）
9 則留言:
其實689是可以用任何理由檢控你的 , 用衛生條例檢控標語都有呀 , 那些間接維護689的人 , 就是同幾十萬上街的市民為敵啊
The bottom photo couldn't be this year's July-01, as the opposite lanes weren't opened.
其實很多時候都是警察故意不放行，讓人群等到不耐煩而離開。本人曾與友人在銅鑼灣渣旬坊那兒困了半小時，警察才俾你行！再者，遊行既是預先申請，交通繞道的安排實在可以預早便安排妥善。人多時，加開行車線讓人群行，是可以做到的。兩者不存衝突，只是警察常以此為由，製造事端。
今年故意刁難的情況特別嚴重 , 還檢控搞遊行的組織 , 應該是上頭的策略轉變了
If one looks closer to the banner on the ISUZU van, it said "07 08 普選".
區醫生,
The photo on this webpage is taken not very far away from Hysan Place this year :
http://mashable.com/2014/07/01/hong-kong-democracy-rally/
More photos here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/02/pro-democracy-hong-kong-protest_n_5551498.html
遊行人數如果50萬/6小時, 那豈不是每分鐘1388人行過某一點? 如有20%中途離開, 那麼也有1110人, 有無這麼寛的路?
>> 那豈不是每分鐘1388人行過某一點?
Your math is obviously incorrect and you are trying to mislead. Your "某一點" actually means "1 person going through that 某一點 at any time during the 7-1 march", which could never happen (, unless in a communism or 軍管country). You have no evidence on "20%中途離開", and for this year, I suspect that the number of people who "中途離開" is much much higher than your "20%".
Your logic is faulty, because you indulge on the number of people who came out for the 7-1 march, but fail to include people who want to come out to protest but couldn't or wouldn't. The "622 proVote" already tells you that the potential population of 7-1 march could be as high as 790 thousands.
A responsible government would listen to a single person's opinion. But our current government obviously don't want to listen to any opposing opinions.
張貼留言